User talk:Wikiauditor201

Your personal attacks against Bryan...

I read your defence of your actions, at Talk:Bryan Legend.

Supposing, for the sake of argument, the claims you made there were true? Could you claim the relatively looser inclusion rules at wikialpha authorized you to draft the pages you drafted, denouncing him?

I do not believe you were authorized to draft those pages, as, loose though the rules here are, they do not authorize attack pages.

Now if Bryan had been convicted of fraud, or some other financial crime, you could write a neutrally written article about him, provided you neutrally cited reliable sources that discussed those crimes. If he had been convicted of a financial crime, and there was enough coverage of him to satisfy the Wikipedia's GNG, you could have submitted that article to the Wikipedia.

Wikialpha's clues are looser. In my opinion an article about Bryan could be drafted here, based merely on authoritative articles that discussed him being charged, or where genuinely reliable sources called for him to be charged. In my opinion, it would not be an attack page if you cited genuinely reliable sources calling Bryan a fraudster.

In my opinion, your article was an attack page because you editorialized, and put your own accusations in Wikialpha's voice. Geo Swan (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)